Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:38:10 -0800
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com>, markm@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: yarrow random generator
Message-ID:  <4B3530C2.4020607@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912251345230.73550@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <5a5b03660912240445x7df1498dt42e29d93105efebc@mail.gmail.com>	<oCmohG1K70vWpt/39IVPMdciTgk@DNdB9ElzNmEFYWRqT2UTVtuts%2BE>	<4B339F27.6020707@freebsd.org>	<5a5b03660912240941r6b76a839u819a8a1408816386@mail.gmail.com>	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0912241945490.73550@fledge.watson.org>	<20091224231334.2e242371@gumby.homeunix.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0912251345230.73550@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote:
> I'll point Mark Murray at this thread and see if we can get him to opine
> some on the current design choices and any potential changes to address
> them.  I was interested by your observation that the boot-time dumping
> of bits into /dev/random may overflow the buffering -- 

I was peripherally involved in the introduction of yarrow in the sense
that I wrote most of the rc and periodic stuff for it so I am also
interested in this issue. Rather than speculating about whether it's
overflowing the buffer perhaps a patch can be produced to test this
hypothesis? I can't do it today, but if no one else gets around to it
soon I will give it a look.


Doug

-- 

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B3530C2.4020607>