Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:18:26 -0400 From: Randy Pratt <bsd-unix@earthlink.net> To: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox? Message-ID: <20060703191826.1cf56769.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <op.tb4l8uu29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> References: <op.tb4l8uu29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> wrote: > Hello folks, > > Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel > to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using > x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am happy to move from fluxbox to > something like fluxbox-old (got any better name?) but I will not maintain > it as I shall drop it to ports@FreeBSD.org. If I get no reply until > Fluxbox released at 1.0 then the 0.1.14 version will be gone for good. I'm using the older fluxbox and also know of a few others who are also dragging their feet. I've actually had my attention elsewhere and wasn't following the fluxbox-devel but I'll give it a whirl on a test box in the next few days. I doubt I'd request that the old version remain in the tree in any event since I'd keep it along with a few other local ports if I really wanted to stick with the old version. Thanks for the notice though so I can start paying attention :-) Randy --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060703191826.1cf56769.bsd-unix>