Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2010 14:30:30 +0100 From: "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-8@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r208766 - stable/8/sys/netinet Message-ID: <8185F188-5D80-4215-976C-4CAC6C4C5C26@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin_ysJUCgec_-RnpSpt5Vz2mV_6RhFEtaNHWP9m@mail.gmail.com> References: <201006030855.o538tjke024438@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTimEyii8eF05vgQRuSh5eQVwBceIcxwgFeUSu80b@mail.gmail.com> <0925CEED-A973-4820-A8DA-E5EDD44CCBDF@freebsd.org> <AANLkTin_ysJUCgec_-RnpSpt5Vz2mV_6RhFEtaNHWP9m@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 Jun 2010, at 20:33, Ermal Lu=E7i wrote: > Interface event are not an issue for pfSense architecture since it > controls all the underlying data and i think most of the divert > applications do not care much about interface events apart renaming. > Keeping both options sounds reasonable too. A patch along these lines would, I think, be most welcome. There is, of = course, the issue of a short window before the socket option is set -- = possibly there's a good way to distinguish this via the sockaddr? Robert=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8185F188-5D80-4215-976C-4CAC6C4C5C26>