Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:55:12 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND Message-ID: <20111228175512.GB27286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAE_wXn1DzpxhhN_ASF%2B-LuxRBsdfgA8Se3ydhAgeJs5p53=VPg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20111228075422.GA18064@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EFAE80D.9040900@my.gd> <20111228130734.GA23763@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EFB1B4F.2090504@my.gd> <CAE_wXn2qKfQg_Od=VfX63TcvDSRFEz2ZLCDZDs71QjP2604QOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE_wXn1DzpxhhN_ASF%2B-LuxRBsdfgA8Se3ydhAgeJs5p53=VPg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Andreev wrote: [dd] > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence > on this value is lesser. > So I advice you to keep all as is. Be it so. Thank you. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111228175512.GB27286>