Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 13:17:14 +0000 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <pi@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r469188 - head/ports-mgmt/pkg_replace Message-ID: <01010163359962dc-36ee8574-dbd7-4cc6-8032-e04a80a18f1e-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <20180506105012.GA39087@FreeBSD.org> References: <201805061015.w46AF3HQ070595@repo.freebsd.org> <20180506102749.GA58637@FreeBSD.org> <20180506103420.GW25490@fc.opsec.eu> <20180506105012.GA39087@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 10:50:12AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > *facepalm*. This poudriere-driven development is more and more disturbing. > You didn't attempt to understand the problem, you didn't attempt to fix the > PLIST_FILES (remove bogus %%ETCDIR%% since this is Makefile), you didn't > ask for a peer review. meta@ pessimized the port, provided wrong commit > log (it tells *nothing* about poudriere failing with a signal 6 in make > package, it says "pet portlint"), and you've approved it like there's > nothing wrong with all of this. :-( Sorry about that. I understand what I should have done and I could do. Then what should I do next? Should I turn back to PLIST_FILES? What should I do from the next time not to repeat such a folly? -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01010163359962dc-36ee8574-dbd7-4cc6-8032-e04a80a18f1e-000000>