Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:03:25 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: yammi-1.0.r1_3 failed on i386 5-exp] Message-ID: <20041222200325.GA53171@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200412220235.42655.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <20041221193116.GA64452@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412212041.43215.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <20041222012736.GA60601@xor.obsecurity.org> <200412220235.42655.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 02:35:42AM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Wednesday 22 of December 2004 02:27, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 08:41:42PM +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > On Tuesday 21 of December 2004 20:31, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > xorg fallout > > > > > > Yes, this one was expected, waiting for feedback from maintainer abou= t PR > > > 75079, which upgrades yammi and also fixes this problem (but > > > unfortunately breaks yammi on 4.X). > > > > Since our immediate focus is on 4.x, I'd suggest marking this port > > BROKEN if X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=3Dxorg and leaving it for now (commit with > > portmgr approval if you like). > > > > Kris >=20 > The trouble with upgraded port in PR is rather with gcc on 4.x (or the wa= y g++=20 > includes behave) as far as I understand. But it is on my thoughts and if = I=20 > don't hear from maintainer, I'll try if the fix (or rather a hint to what= =20 > might be fix) i gave in PR works on 4.X (I only tested if it compiles), a= nd=20 > either commit that or mark the port broken on 4.X before the 30th. The reason I suggested leaving it broken with xorg but working on 4.x is so that any hypothetical users of 4.11-RELEASE can use the port. But, it's probably not a big deal, and the maintainer doesn't appear to be too interested in this problem. I think the only remaining nit is the missing file from the dri pkg-plist which turned up on the pointyhat build. Apart from that, you're good to go! Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBydMMWry0BWjoQKURAlSiAKD1w95XRFZL0/WPpa8ttsklfYsbwwCfbLH6 HXf64GNNqpVPh7wlX7mVOoY= =QdAh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041222200325.GA53171>