Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 12:51:48 +0800 From: Charlie Root <root@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for Developers (Was: Re: The Website) Message-ID: <20040401045148.GA34170@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> In-Reply-To: <20040401040221.GA33856@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au> References: <002f01c4165c$a0c0d1d0$6f01a8c0@miter.local> <40697A82.2070402@sitetronics.com> <20040330101519.R2711@beck.quonix.net> <200403301116.51886.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> <4069C8F2.5000809@sitetronics.com> <406AF173.6040003@sitetronics.com> <20040401040221.GA33856@cimbali.dssrg.curtin.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> now hes been differentiated and is targetted specifically by > being presented with case studies and other information that > tells him that others have done similar things and that a decision > he is making is likely to be low risk, cost effective, and has a > positive outcome. I didn't think of it at the time but case studies don't have to specifically mention FreeBSD. If the study is platform neutral then a link can still be made between what method was used and the ability to use that method on FreeBSD. For instance, a Perl success story about a particular solution and knowledge that Perl runs on FreeBSD will reinforce the notion that FreeBSD can be part of the solution. I'm just trying to enlarge the pool of Advocacy material that could be used.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040401045148.GA34170>