Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 17:10:47 -0700 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: David Xu <bsddiy@yahoo.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c (fwd) Message-ID: <3D584E87.4EAB0D0E@mindspring.com> References: <20020812055315.7682.qmail@web20907.mail.yahoo.com> <20020812104959.GA1645@nagual.pp.ru> <3D579603.3FA86DD7@mindspring.com> <20020812113101.GA2089@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > > UGH! > > > > #1 License on patch is GPL > > Why not Microsoft? I don't unserstand the question. Why not the same license that's areleady on the source code for "su"? > > #2 I guess now that this irritant is gone, the signals code > > will remain screwed up, until some time later when you > > see the shark fin above water, just before it bites > > someone else? > > Read commit message 2 or 3 times. Meditate on each word. I did. It's still an order of operation problem in the kernel during fork(), as Bruce pointed out in a later posting (so me pointing it out here is probably redundant... 8-)). I still think other code is going to have the problem, too, so changing su alone doesn't fix things. Better to not deliver the tty output stopped signal. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3D584E87.4EAB0D0E>