Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:38:00 +0300 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r275326 - in head: sys/dev/cxgbe/tom sys/kern sys/netinet sys/sys usr.bin/bluetooth/btsockstat usr.bin/netstat usr.bin/systat Message-ID: <20141130183800.GA47144@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <547B5DB1.2030003@freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmoniCHqV7FO97RWa%2BJxhWmSfy09LPY3gZW%2BQ9wwJfL74JA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian & Alfred, On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 09:55:05AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> I really wished that these commits got individual reviews before they went in. On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 10:10:57AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: A> Agree, this was already discussed as quite possibly an incorrect way A> forward some months ago. A> A> Where is the actual review for this huge change to the networking stack? A> The development was going on in the open branch, and I've been sending the diff on the new sendfile constantly during this year. Last time I sent the diff, the discussion very quickly moved to Lua in kernel, script(2) and other buzz, actually ignoring my review and test request and hijacking my thread: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2014-September/015861.html Yes, Alfred did ask me why can't this be accomplished with socket upcalls, and replied I to him, but discussion ended there: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2014-September/015858.html Probably the script(2) topic was more appealing. If you don't mind, I will make a separate replies on your actual technical questions. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141130183800.GA47144>