Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2017 08:03:32 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Benjamin Kaduk <bjk@freebsd.org> Cc: Ben Laurie <ben@links.org>, Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net>, "freebsd-security@freebsd.org security" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Crypto overhaul Message-ID: <23376.1509177812@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org> References: <dc08792a-3215-611c-eb9f-4936a0d621f9@metricspace.net> <CAG5KPzws=jmF2wLeEAz8Lzn7Ugude=0w5neoQjeDjYnGtJpS9Q@mail.gmail.com> <13959.1509132270@critter.freebsd.dk> <CAG5KPzxGtAwV-svCv24FbZtLvxKCwX7OSyb2pPaTc63EUmFFGA@mail.gmail.com> <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <20171028022557.GE96685@kduck.kaduk.org>, Benjamin Kaduk writes: >But I think the main issue with OpenSSL in base that was leading to >thoughts about replacing it is the mismatch between FreeBSD release >branch support lifecycles and OpenSSL release branch support lifecycles. That's not why I want OpenSSL gone from the tree. My reason is that I think OpenSSLs architecture, (to the extent you can talk about OpenSSL having one), APIs and the source code are all horrible. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?23376.1509177812>