Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 14:50:49 -0600 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Ken McGlothlen <mcglk@artlogix.com> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), Christopher Schulte <schulte+freebsd@nospam.schulte.org>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:21.tcpip Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020418144331.0222d830@nospam.lariat.org> In-Reply-To: <87it6oajyo.fsf@ralf.artlogix.com> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020418114304.00dccf00@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020418095356.024354c0@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020417230144.032ad390@nospam.lariat.org> <200204171923.g3HJNga58899@freefall.freebsd.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020418095356.024354c0@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020418114304.00dccf00@nospam.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:24 PM 4/18/2002, Ken McGlothlen wrote: >Even well-funded organizations such as Microsoft can't possibly test all >combinations of hardware; True. And it's not reasonable to expect it. But it'd be wonderful if, say, a -p4 came out and you could watch the -STABLE list to see if anyone found a problem with it before installing it yourself. If that Japanese -p3 build is either a snapshot of RELENG_4_5 or a snapshot of -STABLE that does not seem to be causing people trouble, it's an example of The Right Thing.... It should be duplicated on the various mirrors and it should be the preferred version to download. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20020418144331.0222d830>