Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 23:53:57 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Daniel O'Connor <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Moving UUCP to ports Message-ID: <20010917235356.A41864@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3BA6EB64.A4F9720C@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:36:20PM -0700 References: <XFMail.20010918154737.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <3BA6EB64.A4F9720C@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:36:20PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > In any case, you have ignored the first argument: if FreeBSD > does not maintain UUCP for FreeBSD, who will maintain UUCP > for FreeBSD? Jeez, Terry..it's times like this I think you say this kind of thing just to be difficult. No-one has been maintaining UUCP in FreeBSD for the past several years (do a quick search on open PRs), but if someone suddenly wanted to they can maintain the port just as easily (easier, since anyone in the world can be a port maintainer, whereas you have to be a committer to maintain code in the base system). I would have thought that to be obvious. Kris --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7pu+EWry0BWjoQKURAtAaAJ9wUO8aXKe1JCSRvqYCM+biwHwbIgCggvgZ OUyCfDB98dqTND+sKwTJm6Y= =Tprm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --envbJBWh7q8WU6mo-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010917235356.A41864>