Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Jun 2004 11:05:11 +0400
From:      "Yuriy Tsibizov" <Yuriy.Tsibizov@gfk.ru>
To:        "Mathew Kanner" <mat@cnd.mcgill.ca>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: What happened to src/sys/dev/sound/midi ?
Message-ID:  <C192C8912E798F4399668791C8965190675017@mx.hhp.local>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >	In my humble opinion:  We should axe this driver as "the
> > >current version is hurting people and should be put out of its
> > >misery".  The current driver (before removal) simply didn't work =
and
> > >people were trying to use it.
> >=20
> > I send you again,
> > "Are there any snapshot of your audio related work available for=20
> > review?"=20
> > At least, the older code shouldn't be removed until the replacement=20
> > appears.
>=20
> 	In regards to MIDI, I've been posting links to patches for
> about a year now.  I've had relatively little feedback.  I'm=20
> not sure if
> the current patches that are posted will compile after some changes to
> infrastructure.

Mathew,=20
I've added support for your year-old midi2 code (dated June, 14th) to =
emu10kx driver. It builds well under -CURRENT (with addition of =
d_version to device structures). It would be nice, if you can provide =
snapshot of your current work to let people test it before commiting.

Now, for day and a half (this weekend), at least three people downloaded =
your midi2 code that I have on my website.
Emu10kx can be compiled without MIDI at all (and they do not need to =
download midi2 to build driver without MIDI or with NEWMIDI), and I =
think these people do need MIDI under FreeBSD-CURRENT.=20

I also can say, that old NEWMIDI was not dead (MIDI I/O was working for =
me) when it was removed from -CURRENT.

Yuriy Tsibizov,
http://chibis.persons.gfk.ru/audigy/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C192C8912E798F4399668791C8965190675017>