Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:31:14 +0300 (MSK)
From:      Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To:        Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Using read-only NULLFS leads to panic. gdb output included, e asy to reproduce.
Message-ID:  <20040310172851.M5807@woozle.rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040309033529.GA88800@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
References:  <20040303134001.GA63144@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <200403080858.JAA18049@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> <20040309033529.GA88800@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Tim,

On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Tim Robbins wrote:

TR> > Did I miss this MFC, or haven't you back-ported it yet?
TR>
TR> Here's the patch against RELENG_4:
TR> http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/nullfs-4.diff
TR>
TR> It works, but I'm not going to commit it until I've had time to
TR> check a few things first.

Thanks a lot for your patch! We'll test it in near future, but in the mean
time: I see your patch is attacking similar bugs in a different way as
Matt/Cameron in

Date:      Thu, 14 Nov 2002 11:29:26 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        "Cameron Grant" <gandalf@vilnya.demon.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Patch #6 (Re: Shared files within a jail)

Did you ever evaluate their patch? I did use it with r/o nullfs with rather
good results...


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040310172851.M5807>