Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:43:45 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: LuKreme <kremels@kreme.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Message-ID: <cf57a0e4-25af-d44e-bfbf-b02e1a4a8347@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <A64AD6C3-F931-41FA-BAB6-CFBF88E6C3FC@kreme.com> References: <566f28fc-8c6b-0d43-8455-0524e1965896@punkt.de> <A64AD6C3-F931-41FA-BAB6-CFBF88E6C3FC@kreme.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
LuKreme wrote on 2019/10/11 00:23: > On Oct 10, 2019, at 10:01, Lars Liedtke <liedtke@punkt.de> wrote: >> >> Why not just make building in IPv6 support the default, and introduce a >> flag if someone really needs or wants to build without that support? > > Because it adds to the load of testing. If you really need it, build from source. Building official packages with IPv6 is OK. Removing existing options from ports and saying "build from source" is ... stupid. Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf57a0e4-25af-d44e-bfbf-b02e1a4a8347>