Date: Sun, 17 Nov 1996 08:48:01 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de (Wolfram Schneider) Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org, joerg@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/sed main.c Message-ID: <199611170748.IAA11061@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199611170350.EAA02826@campa.panke.de> from Wolfram Schneider at "Nov 17, 96 04:50:23 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Wolfram Schneider wrote: > >> Erm, as I told the submitter, this introduces C programmer's bug > >> #<a bit larger than 1>: feof() is not valid until EOF has been read. > > > >Huh? I can't find any reference claiming this. > > The reference is in my private mail box, as Bruce wrote. Nope, my question was which standard claims that feof() could return wrong results after a successful fopen() but before reaching the EOF of the stream. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611170748.IAA11061>