Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:52:12 -0800 From: ray@redshift.com To: Ken Gunderson <kgunders@teamcool.net>,freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More about the 9500S-4 issues with the MoBo and FreeBSD... Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20051129085212.00a50918@pop.redshift.com> In-Reply-To: <20051129083231.1df4158e.kgunders@teamcool.net> References: <3.0.1.32.20051129071832.00a87dc8@pop.redshift.com> <20051129070805.7c6c5cef.kgunders@teamcool.net> <438C2322.8020801@axis.nl> <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <20051119120051.39BE216A41F@hub.freebsd.org> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051125121159.00a5d2f8@pop.redshift.com> <438B0CEC.4070308@wmptl.com> <438C2322.8020801@axis.nl> <3.0.1.32.20051129051812.00a87dc8@pop.redshift.com> <20051129070805.7c6c5cef.kgunders@teamcool.net> <3.0.1.32.20051129071832.00a87dc8@pop.redshift.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
| I'm waiting to see how things play out w/a DOA server before I buy/ | recommend Tyan (other than this I have several w/no problems). Using | an SLI based gaming board for a webserver was, IMHO, not the best use | of logic regardless of preferred supplier issues. I am curious as to | why they didn't opt for a dual Opteron for semi high-end database use. | A dual core Athalon isn't going to come close. Not to mention that the | Asus board doesn't use ECC Registered memory. Standardizing workstation | and server stuff on same hw platform is bad planning. Unless, of | course, one is expecting the venture to fail and hopes to redeploy that | Asus board and dual core Athalon in their new high end gaming system... LOL - just tell us how you really feel Ken :-) Ray
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.20051129085212.00a50918>