Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 18 Jan 1998 22:55:52 -0500 (EST)
From:      Tim Vanderhoek <ac199@hwcn.org>
To:        John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Docs for bsd.ports.mk
Message-ID:  <Pine.GSO.3.96.980118224204.11695A-100000@james.hwcn.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980118223014.26398Q-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Jan 1998, John Fieber wrote:

> On Sun, 18 Jan 1998, Warner Losh wrote:
> 
> > Is it time to expand the docs for bsd.ports.mk?
> 
> You mean beyond what www.freebsd.org/handbook/porting.html
> provides? 

Which is wonderful if you're writing a port.  However, for the
generic user of the ports system, there is nothing which serves
as a reference document.  There is a section of the handbook
which explains how the system works, but a tutorial != a
reference (would one like having to read a tutorial on grep
everytime one wanted a quick reference for the -w option?)

A manpage documenting things such as the purpose of ECHO_MSG,
NOCLEANDEPENDS, BATCH, etc. would be great!  If you grab some of
the stuff from the ports.sgml of the handbook (and trim it down
respectively), that would be a good start.  The
http://www.handbook.porting/html probably has little that would
be useful (like using a C manual to explain how to use vi).

Questions such as "How do I avoid cleaning dependencies?" are
becoming more common and wouldn't be necessary with an
appropriate and concise manpage.

That said, once you've studied bsd.port.mk for a while, the whole
ports system takes on a new level of sex appeal, and we wouldn't
want to discourage new users from realizing that potential.  ;-)


--
Outnumbered?  Maybe.  Outspoken?  Never!
tIM...HOEk




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.980118224204.11695A-100000>