Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 16:03:41 -0800 From: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>, Gary Kline <kline@thought.org>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: openoffice and java on 5.2 Message-ID: <20040312000341.GB10603@tao.thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040311211814.GB76764@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20040311040150.GA14768@tao.thought.org> <20040311211814.GB76764@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 09:18:14PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 08:01:50PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > > I'm trying to install the latest OO on my 5.2 server, but for > > some reason, it can't see the java installation there. > > Originally, I had java/jdk14. No luck. Same with java/jdk13. > > > > Should I take the simpler route and download the pkg for 52 > > or is there a way of getting OO-1.1.0_3 to see the java? > > Did you fill in the appropriate stuff in the Tools>Options>Security > menu item? I found that the ClassPath setting was absolutely vital > for using JDBC connectivity to databses. > > Errr... or did I infact completely misinterpret what you meant, and > actually you're saying that OO won't install because it doesn't pick > up that you've got java/jdk14 installed as your default JDK and so > complains about unfulfilled dependencies? You could try setting > JAVA_HOME to /usr/local/jdk1.4.2 and/or editing /usr/local/etc/javavms > to that the FREEBSD-JDK1.4.2 line comes first in the file. > The latter. OO didn't pick up my default jdk. (On prev versions, (v1.0.3, e.g); no problem. ) I'll try again given your insights. many thanks, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040312000341.GB10603>