Date: Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:52:59 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net> To: stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -lc vs. -lc_r (building Apache-PHP) Message-ID: <199912271852.NAA75978@rtfm.newton> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.02A.9912271029520.6249-200000@shell.uniserve.ca> from Tom at "Dec 27, 1999 10:31:44 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom once stated: =On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Mikhail Teterin wrote: = =... => What's the magic and why doesn't the port know it? Why is -lc even in => play if some of the components (-lmysqlclient) require -lc_r? Yours, = = libmysqlclient does not require -lc_r, because the library does not =use threads. Only mysqld is threaded. Thank you, Tom, for this correction. However, this does not change much. Some other extension wants threads then... The two different problems are: . it is possible to mix the -lc_r and -lc without specifying either one explicitly . the Apache port may still fail to build a usable executable because of this Yours, -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912271852.NAA75978>