Date: 14 May 2005 09:26:19 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: "mail.schatti.ch" <listman-dated-1117183313.1271a6@schatti.ch> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hints for small file system Message-ID: <443bsq7xc4.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <courier.42852A51.0000D082@mail.schatti.ch> References: <courier.42852A51.0000D082@mail.schatti.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"mail.schatti.ch" <listman-dated-1117183313.1271a6@schatti.ch> writes: > If you had to choose amongst the available filesystems on 5.4 to > contain just about 500kB to a MB, which would you use, and with what > parameters ? Which of these has the lowest administration overhead, > the lowest space overhead ? Generally I go with FAT for small media. If it's going to be a really active filesystem, then UFS will give better speed.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?443bsq7xc4.fsf>