Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Sep 1998 18:20:17 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Download of FreeBSD 3.0-SNAP
Message-ID:  <19980914182017.A12986@nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <199809142352.QAA02068@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Mon, Sep 14, 1998 at 04:52:18PM -0700
References:  <199809141811.LAA18415@usr05.primenet.com> <199809142352.QAA02068@dingo.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Since it works with bp's, it's clear that it sorts on linear block 
> offset, which isn't exactly optimal but is less suboptimal than pure 
> randomness.

Sounds like the same performance win you get feeding a super scaler
processor code ordered by a VLIW compiler.  The super scaler design
searches for parallelism among instructions at execution time, and being
feed instuctions in a good ILP ordering by a VLIW compiler, of course it
finds more.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu  -or-  obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980914182017.A12986>