Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 11:43:42 +0100 From: Pete French <petefrench@ingresso.co.uk> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org, kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk, petefrench@ingresso.co.uk Subject: Re: Anyone using HAST in production / performance? Message-ID: <E1Whcqc-0008Eq-0C@dilbert.ingresso.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <CEFDCA91DE72D1DB2DD40453@study64.tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I guess if you're just using the zool 'locally' - that 31Mbyte/sec may be > close to the performance you're getting [estimated]? I just diud a very unscientific test - dd of /dev/random into a fle, and I see about 30 meg/second in gstat, and the end result is about that too, so well guessed ;) > What version of FreeBSD are you using? I'm just wondering if that's making > a difference... 9.2 - from the day after heartbleed came out. 10k drives, gig ether between the boxes. -pete.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1Whcqc-0008Eq-0C>