Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 May 1998 20:30:30 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Lutz Albers <lutz@muc.de>
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: problems installing the new StarOffice version 
Message-ID:  <199805190330.UAA00349@antipodes.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 17 May 1998 21:30:53 %2B0200." <355F3AED.19D0777B@muc.de> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Please always CC' emulation-related stuff to the emulation list.  If I 
get hit by a bus, at least then someone else has a chance of picking it 
up.  8)

> Mike Smith wrote:
> > > I've just received the new StarOffice 4.0 CD-ROM for Linux (the one you
> > > can order from their web-site). This is a newly compiled version
> > > (according to the readme notes).  The setup bombs with an Abort during
> > > install on a 2.2.6 system. Here is the last part pf a ktrace/kdump
> > > output:
> > 
> > Is this kdump or linux_kdump?  If the former, could you repeat with the
> > latter?
> 
> Sorry, didn't know about linux_kdump. Here it is:
> 
>   4329 setup.bin RET   linux_time 895432581/0x355f3785
>   4329 setup.bin CALL  linux_newstat(0x86b4924,0xefbfc590)
>   4329 setup.bin NAMI  "setup.ini"
>   4329 setup.bin RET   linux_newstat JUSTRETURN

That looks better.  Check for setup.ini

>   4329 setup.bin CALL  getpid
>   4329 setup.bin RET   getpid 4329/0x10e9
>   4329 setup.bin CALL  linux_open(0xefbfbdf0,0x800,0)
>   4329 setup.bin NAMI  "/compat/linux/proc/4329/cmdline"
>   4329 setup.bin NAMI  "/proc/4329/cmdline"
>   4329 setup.bin RET   linux_open JUSTRETURN

This is still *&^%*&^%$c stupid.

>   4329 setup.bin PSIG  SIGSEGV caught handler=0x835e794 mask=0x0
> code=0xc

And this is the same problem.

> This looks really funny. Does FreeBSD emulate the Linux /proc fs ? I
> don't know WHY the did this, the older installer worked fine :-(

No, it doesn't.  It looks like someone Got Smart.  Does the setup.ini 
file exist?  If not, try touching it and see what happens.

> > > Any Ideas ?
> > 
> > Not immediately, sorry.
> 
> :-(

Basically, we need to emulate more of the /proc cruft that Linux has.  
*sigh*

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805190330.UAA00349>