Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:10:03 GMT From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: standards/86484: [PATCH] mkfifo(1) uses wrong permissions Message-ID: <200801280910.m0S9A370002360@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR standards/86484; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: toby@apple.com, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: standards/86484: [PATCH] mkfifo(1) uses wrong permissions Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 23:17:03 -0500 POSIX's description of how umask interacts with -m for various tools is a maze of twisting little references, all different; it wouldn't surprise me if they meant something other than what they said. :) To take a step back, I would argue that mkfifo(1), mkdir(1), and install(1) should all have similar semantics with respect to -m, to reduce confusion. What those semantics are, I'm not sure. Solaris 10 seems to behave as FreeBSD does, and Linux 2.6.12 seems to behave as Toby Petersin wants FreeBSD to behave.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200801280910.m0S9A370002360>