Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:04:59 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   RE: Breaking out kern_mac.c into multiple files
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20030730170459.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030730164805.89045P-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 30-Jul-2003 Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> As the scope of the MAC Framework has grown, so has kern_mac.c.  It's
> reached the point where breaking it into separate files would make it a
> lot easier to read, by virtue of logically grouping its exposed functions,
> APIs, etc.  Similarly scoped extension frameworks, such as NetGraph and
> GEOM, have opted to go into sys/$framework, with files named similarly. 
> My leaning was to do something similar -- add sys/mac, and then have
> mac_framework.c, mac_net.c, mac_sysvipc.c, etc.  I probably won't get to
> this for a bit because I want to avoid introducing large numbers of
> conflicts for our outstanding changes, but I was going to poll for general
> interest in placement, naming, etc.  Some of the other choices would be to
> keep it in kern/, but rename (similar to the System V IPC bits, VFS bits,
> et al). 

sys/security/mac please.

We already have a sys/security directory, let's use it.

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20030730170459.jhb>