Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 09:34:24 +0100 From: "Greg Quinlan" <Greg.Quinlan@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> To: <aw1@stade.co.uk> Cc: "Phil Regnauld" <regnauld@ftf.net>, "Pat Lynch" <lynch@bsdunix.net>, "Adrian Wontroba" <aw1@stade.co.uk>, <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: More SCO Propaganda Message-ID: <00d601befe8b$f35b2aa0$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9909111225120.2002-100000@bytor.rush.net> <001601befdcb$20e94720$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> <19990913114732.51670@ns.int.ftf.net> <003601befdd1$e2f5bbe0$5214010a@swlct.sthames.nhs.uk> <19990914045451.A35002@titus.stade.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: Adrian Wontroba <aw1@stade.co.uk> > <various things about the SCO experience> > > Regrettably, all those unfortunate things are true. Fragile, > over-priced, under supported, the nickle and dime approach, ..... > > It was just your criticism of SCO's statement about their Open Source > stance I was challenging (8-) It was more about supporting the Open Source arena, rather than their product or customers, that I found amusing/ disturbing. And if in the past SCO have shown that their own product to be fagile, what is their support for Open Source likely to be? :)))) Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00d601befe8b$f35b2aa0$5214010a>