Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 01:09:27 +0200 From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> To: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GSL update has broken dependent ports Message-ID: <20040706230927.GJ59374@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <m3zn6cag77.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> References: <8cb27cbf0407051239601b72a4@mail.gmail.com> <m3fz84bxct.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20040706222752.GI59374@voodoo.oberon.net> <m3zn6cag77.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Z1OTrj3C7qypP14j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 01:06:36AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote: > Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net> writes: >=20 > > Usually you don't need to notify another maintainers about > > library chase, it's committer's responsibility. >=20 > Bad idea, particularly without HEADS-UP. Depends on the amount of ports depeding on the updated port. > Remember the gettext update? It would have nuked the whole ports tree > beyond recognition. gettext is another kind of story than gsl, gettext requires experimental build on the cluster. -Kirill --Z1OTrj3C7qypP14j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA6zEnQC1G6a60JuURAmfmAJ9qTMkS0PvNx2AJzqSGhCIbWEb5UwCfdj72 WAJQAMUCzIRL/oE6L4aMSrg= =MOTk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Z1OTrj3C7qypP14j--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040706230927.GJ59374>