Date: 17 Feb 2002 11:36:22 -0800 From: swear@blarg.net (Gary W. Swearingen) To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: "freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why is Python slower on FreeBSD than Windows?/Terry is a genius:) Message-ID: <7zsn7zgatl.n7z@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <3C6F8896.CDB8A2FE@mindspring.com> References: <20020216180815.J91166-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> <3C6F8896.CDB8A2FE@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes: > Doug White wrote: > > > > Good luck. The Vaios are infamous for having bad ACPI implementations. > > Works in Windows: Not a VAIO problem, it's a FreeBSD > problem. > > Unless you are saying Windows Programmers are better > than FreeBSD programmers? I think I get the point, but I'll bite the troll anyway. Saying that it's a FreeBSD problem and not a VAIO problem is like saying that a dead battery is a driver's problem and not a car problem. A dead battery IS a car problem and a non-standard (and closed) ACPI implementation in a VAIO IS a VAIO problem, unless we don't share a common language. In cases like this the particular Windows programmers involved usually ARE better (at least a lot faster), because of their better access to VAIO designers and/or design documents than FreeBSD programmers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7zsn7zgatl.n7z>