Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:55:14 -0800
From:      John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To:        Dmitry Agaphonov <rzhe@agava.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Kevent(2) doesn't notify about EVFILT_WRITE filter event
Message-ID:  <20051201185514.GP885@funkthat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051201150608.5e8d49f1@rzhe.agava-dubna.local>
References:  <20051201150608.5e8d49f1@rzhe.agava-dubna.local>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Agaphonov wrote this message on Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 15:06 +0300:
> I have two applications (server A and server B, A asks B for data to
> serve clients) communicating via UNIX-domain socket.  Testing local
> clients interact to server A via UNIX-domain sockets too.  Server A
> uses kqueue(2) to handle clients and server B.
> 
> When about 20 clients start requesting server A without delay, kevent(2)
> doesn't notify about requested EVFILT_WRITE after only few small
> requests.
> 
> 
> Dumping kevent(2) changelist and eventlist gives the following:
> 
> Server A asks for write event (with EV_ONESHOT flag set) to server B:
> [13:45:36][DBG] Changing SysEvent: ident: 8, filter: -2, flags: 0x11, fflags: 0, data: 0, udata: 0x0
> [13:45:36][DBG] Received SysEvent: ident: 8, filter: -2, flags: 0x11, fflags: 0, data: 8192, udata: 0x0
> 
> So, the socket send buffer has 8192 bytes free.  Then A sends 426
> bytes to B.
> 
> Then server A asks for write event again:
> [13:45:36][DBG] Changing SysEvent: ident: 8, filter: -2, flags: 0x11, fflags: 0, data: 0, udata: 0x0
> 
> After this, EVFILT_WRITE event is not returned.  Noone else writes to
> this socket.  How it is possible?

are you checking the output from the kevent that sets the sysevent?
kevent if you do something "stupid" like set a _ONESHOT in kevent, and
provide space for events to be returned to userland, the _ONESHOT will
be immediately returned and cleared...

It could also be an error is trying to be set, but can't be if you
don't provide return space...  so w/o seeing your code, I'd make sure
when setting you are able to receive some events, and check what events
you get back...

> When I only turn on some additional logging which makes nothing but
> logs something and thus makes some small delays between kevent(2)
> calls -- all works fine, kevent(2) notifies about all write events.
> 
> 
> Could anyone please give thoughts about why kevent(2) can behave so?
> I have definitely no idea where the problem can be.
> 
> This happens on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE (cvsup'ed Nov 20 2005), SMP kernel,
> P4 with HT.

If you could post the parts of your code around kevent calls, I could
better help you...

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051201185514.GP885>