Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:26:59 -0300 From: Renato Botelho <garga.bsd@gmail.com> To: Diane Bruce <db@db.net>, Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <7452d2d1-6481-c700-045b-4c2fd8ff84d4@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20170307152400.GA14841@night.db.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170307152400.GA14841@night.db.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/03/17 12:24, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >>> >>> I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first >>> and maybe instead of in long term. >>> >>> The reason is: >>> - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: >>> /usr/share/man >>> - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch >>> upstream build system to install in a non usual path. >> Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is >> gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still >> try to encroach on GNU defaults. > A big yes from me for both of these proposals. > +1 -- Renato Botelho
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7452d2d1-6481-c700-045b-4c2fd8ff84d4>