Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 05:37:13 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: Sten Spans <sten@blinkenlights.nl> Cc: John-Mark Gurney <gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu> Subject: Re: changes to make ethernet packets able to be unaligned... Message-ID: <20050320053637.J54298@odysseus.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503191553060.25978@tea.blinkenlights.nl> References: <20050317221359.GN89312@funkthat.com> <20050318021907.H844@odysseus.silby.com> <20050318092429.GD37984@funkthat.com> <Pine.SOC.4.61.0503191553060.25978@tea.blinkenlights.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Sten Spans wrote: > em with jumboframes is borken atm. > It seems some drivers don't handle the jumboframes - > chained mbufs case quite correctly. > > -- > Sten Spans Totally broken, or broken when used on non-i386 architectures? Mike "Silby" Silbersack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050320053637.J54298>