Date: Sat, 06 May 2006 12:44:12 +0900
From: gnn@FreeBSD.org
To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: RFC {get,set}socktopt SO_DONTFRAGMENT
Message-ID: <m2k68zrf5f.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060505033749.76815.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
References: <20060505033749.76815.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Fri, 5 May 2006 00:37:26 -0300, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > > I would like to propose a new socket option: SO_DONTFRAGMENT > on the lines of IP_DONTFRAG. > > I was trying to tell a socket that it should not fragment > the packets. However, I found out that I could only do it if I had > a "struct socket". If I had a "struct socket" I could set INP_DONTFRAG > which would solve all my problems. > The important question is, "What kind of packets." If you want a sequential packet stream you should use SCTP (www.sctp.org) which has been ported to FreeBSD but is not part of the base system as yet. For packet based streams you should be able to use what is already there. Best, George
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2k68zrf5f.wl%gnn>