Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:05:51 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC
| raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nawp. Even w/o mount -o async. Not Ready For Prime Time. I'd like MFS back, please :-).... On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > Nope. > > lmdd of=file > > in this /tmp got me: > > panic: lockmgr: pid 78175, not exclusive lock holder 5 unlocking > panic > Stopped at Debugger+0x2c: ldq ra,0(sp) <0xfffffe000a2576a0> > <ra=0xfffffc0000524000,sp=0xfffffe000a2576a0> > db> t > Debugger() at Debugger+0x2c > panic() at panic+0x100 > lockmgr() at lockmgr+0x534 > brelse() at brelse+0xa20 > bufdone() at bufdone+0x4a0 > bufdonebio() at bufdonebio+0x1c > swap_pager_strategy() at swap_pager_strategy+0x114 > vm_pager_strategy() at vm_pager_strategy+0x40 > mdstart_swap() at mdstart_swap+0x11c > mdstrategy() at mdstrategy+0x128 > diskstrategy() at diskstrategy+0x150 > spec_strategy() at spec_strategy+0x224 > spec_vnoperate() at spec_vnoperate+0x2c > ufs_strategy() at ufs_strategy+0x140 > ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c > bwrite() at bwrite+0x390 > vop_stdbwrite() at vop_stdbwrite+0x1c > vop_defaultop() at vop_defaultop+0x2c > ufs_vnoperate() at ufs_vnoperate+0x2c > bawrite() at bawrite+0x48 > cluster_wbuild() at cluster_wbuild+0x6a8 > cluster_write() at cluster_write+0x438 > ffs_write() at ffs_write+0x500 > vn_write() at vn_write+0x21c > dofilewrite() at dofilewrite+0x130 > write() at write+0x5c > syscall() at syscall+0x2d4 > XentSys1() at XentSys1+0x10 > db> > > Maybe the 'mount -o async' is the culprit. Hmm. Never had this kind of trouble > with MFS..... > > > On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > >> One should use md(4) and mdconfig(8) rather than MFS nowadays anyways, which > > > >> does work with DEVFS. > > > > > > > >Uh, I don't think so. MFS should be fixed. With MFS you should be able to take > > > >advantage of VM. I don't think the same applies to md. > > > > > > Try it, and come back with numbers if you think it is worse... > > > > Can't really compare right now, now can I, if MFS is broken ... :-)... > > > > But seriously, I'll be using md a lot from now on and I'll let you know if it > > seems broken.... Like I said in other mail (paraphrasing) "Seems like this > > ought to be a VFS, but I don't really care" > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?>