Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 22:38:00 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> To: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3: /stand/ versus /rescue/ ? Message-ID: <416627B8.40601@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200410071043.09015.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> References: <20041003124353.29822.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> <200410051738.32415.freebsd@redesjm.local> <4164BA94.7020009@freebsd.org> <200410071043.09015.josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > On Thursday 07 October 2004 05:40, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>/etc/rc.d/initdiskless should not be using either >>/stand or /rescue. > > Compressed tarball are the most standard and secure way for net boot and > are in real use. > > My 2x250 GB HD doesn't have any problem with the 2 MB stand. But it does have problems with the few dozen KB of uncompressed tarball? Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?416627B8.40601>