Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 15:27:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Lixfeld <jlixfeld@idirect.com> To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anti-Spam from www.sendmail.org Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.971006152552.19877M-100000@thor.idirect.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971006121724.3848A-100000@gdi.uoregon.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Okay, I have added the two patches (domain must resolve, and no non-local relaying) and am noticing some crazyness.. first off, I'm trying to send a message through pine, and am getting this error: [Mail not sent. Sending error: 451 hash map "spammers": unsafe map file] Uhmm.. why?! :) On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Doug White wrote: > On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Jason Lixfeld wrote: > > > Reading up on the anti-spam measures via the rulesets for sendmail.cf, I'm > > confused as to wether or not these measures apply to servers (local hubs) > > or relays only or do these measures apply to both?! > > They apply to everyone, including local workstations. They certainly > should be placed on hubs and relays. This keeps spammers from using your > relays as their relays. > > Doug White | University of Oregon > Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant > http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.971006152552.19877M-100000>