Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 07:08:27 +0200 (CEST) From: "P. U. Kruppa" <root@pukruppa.de> To: Aaron Peterson <aaron@alpete.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd vs. linux - educated opinions wanted Message-ID: <20030517061956.I22968@small.pukruppa.de> In-Reply-To: <E19Gq1F-0006QW-00@host02.ipowerweb.com> References: <E19Gq1F-0006QW-00@host02.ipowerweb.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> what does linux have that freebsd doesn't? what does freebsd have that linux > doesn't? A highly reliable, serious, polite and patient user/developer community. Since I am no computer pro this is very important for me to be able to run a UN*X system. > what are the security issues that should be acknowledged when > deciding which to use for something mission critical in a production > environment? how does one measure/compare stability, and which comes out > on top? I found the highest and only security issue being myself, trying things before reading the manuals and documentations :-) But in the last 4 or 5 years I never succeded in completely wrecking my system. Things could always be repaired with the help of this list (thanks, by the way). Thus I can say FreeBSD is a highly reliable and stable operating system. Regards, Uli. +-----------------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | - Wuppertal - | | Germany | +-----------------------------------+
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030517061956.I22968>