Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:34:20 -0400 From: Josh Ockert <torstenvl@gmail.com> To: Danny Pansters <danny@ricin.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FYI] QT4 licensing looks very bad for *BSD Message-ID: <126eac480506302234303b0369@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <126eac4805063022323f615e0e@mail.gmail.com> References: <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNCEOFFBAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <200507010413.48881.danny@ricin.com> <126eac480506301944461b1201@mail.gmail.com> <200507010509.19049.danny@ricin.com> <126eac4805063022323f615e0e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
PS - Not that I'm claiming that BSD is a total giveaway, but as long as the required notices are intact, there's nothing wrong with BSDL code being imported to GPL code.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?126eac480506302234303b0369>