Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 09:25:45 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> To: "John W. O'Brien" <john@saltant.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Should poudriere skip (IGNORE) a port marked BROKEN? Message-ID: <20151213082545.GP35480@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <566CA199.40706@saltant.com> References: <566CA199.40706@saltant.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! [ports marked BROKEN are build in poudriere and fail] > But poudriere goes ahead with the build, fails on the broken dependency, > and skips the port without printing or logging my helpful BROKEN message. > > Is this by design, or a flaw in my understanding or in poudriere's > implementation? This is by design, there are two places: /usr/local/share/poudriere/testport.sh and /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh where TRYBROKEN=yes is exported, so that /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk starts the build anyway. When I try to debug if I use BROKEN in the right manner, I edited the testport.sh or bulk.sh script not to set TRYBROKEN 8-} -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go !
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20151213082545.GP35480>