Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:41:17 -0400 From: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [feature idea] Allow duplicate files with the same content Message-ID: <6fe13054-5c52-96c1-3951-b8ba7b1dc004@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <dbe601fe-9b27-18af-bd68-e8f259145c9e@rawbw.com> References: <96dbc99f-3a21-423d-18b8-6737c5517ff8@rawbw.com> <4e47eea6-a054-30da-bab1-18b4e82270fb@FreeBSD.org> <dbe601fe-9b27-18af-bd68-e8f259145c9e@rawbw.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --F9euXXulGavQBfJiq2gMlwXFXqmwSLn6N Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="FLO7sxhGHNjw8cdLExDCh5J4DLVrqUcXh"; protected-headers="v1" From: Nikolai Lifanov <lifanov@FreeBSD.org> To: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <6fe13054-5c52-96c1-3951-b8ba7b1dc004@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: [feature idea] Allow duplicate files with the same content References: <96dbc99f-3a21-423d-18b8-6737c5517ff8@rawbw.com> <4e47eea6-a054-30da-bab1-18b4e82270fb@FreeBSD.org> <dbe601fe-9b27-18af-bd68-e8f259145c9e@rawbw.com> In-Reply-To: <dbe601fe-9b27-18af-bd68-e8f259145c9e@rawbw.com> --FLO7sxhGHNjw8cdLExDCh5J4DLVrqUcXh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/25/17 11:37 AM, Yuri wrote: > On 07/25/2017 06:24, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: >> On 7/24/17 6:12 PM, Yuri wrote: >>> Currently several py-backports-* ports install the same __init__.py f= ile >>> into the same location. This is the only conflict between several por= ts. >>> This was by design, because they didn't think it matters to overwrite= >>> the same file installed by another package. [1] >>> >> The content of these is the same functionally but not textually. >> The comments, spacing, single line versus three lines, etc. is >> different. It's the same python code, but it won't hash to the same >> thing. >> >> - Nikolai >> >=20 > Just patch it to be the same if the functionality is the same. >=20 >=20 > Yuri >=20 >=20 This involves patching almost every port from that list. If we are patching almost every port, then I don't see the value of allowing duplicate files. - Nikolai --FLO7sxhGHNjw8cdLExDCh5J4DLVrqUcXh-- --F9euXXulGavQBfJiq2gMlwXFXqmwSLn6N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJIBAEBCAAyFiEE5oT6TcuaWvG5gtjzZ6sv56ecR0UFAll3Zp0UHGxpZmFub3ZA ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcACgkQZ6sv56ecR0Xwuw//S6l9JHcn9yWFXlw+d+HhBkiTNeOQ wwt+QUkcD8MIMpIsCIkzmC6otpKzrNF7TsNv2RH68nMi95hDJfjouHIWYTnhe4NM W6AjgZ5IAK4JcFu4qa0u52W0lg5DNUeJ7I/hc8Sr58F2Sc9CqDpVsPjBPB56/gl/ sz3tfwJ+7x7wFKrs5PoJoU1Qu8oqalN3c4qdpck2J9lpW73Yr8d625pQ1XeOR8OZ lDBx6O4xUHOE33+LyFYZVib4A2OgGYpMVq9jUdFFvkaV9f1SRsWaLdv0az9Rem5v yBlWzKuNFA8py/NAxrxU3AfYfqsQ80qCTv4jDXv0m33218Fsi/Zt7PyQ3oylwikO 2giKqKRPHQduxtt350rLDUt3C9zQOESmn41Ft5T62fZC+ry0PTQYf0RGNQVdbTIX zJRyZTh0GOfREHv52RT7tV8U7k6Lyz5Us5ogmuSzUaIoLoxl6YfCqpxHo9UyPmaI 0/LRK012n1gBTodz09DUglLICf1wOWyfmIFs9hyaeH/GOmZ4L6AnxBukEpkr/rSX v8nsdu3x7dQJYU6YiKEyPP5paPYRw5ArKLLoHvctn5ksmG08oC9jGbnmA1ItqLQL 2b58qTSCbZs951qsIhPOJKp1NajEUh7yYWi/6cHbupkY7a5pd96N3edWZ89mvcYf /l9g3zVqmisNLdc= =LwYC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --F9euXXulGavQBfJiq2gMlwXFXqmwSLn6N--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6fe13054-5c52-96c1-3951-b8ba7b1dc004>