Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 08:31:15 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org (FreeBSD-current users), nate@mt.sri.com Subject: Re: libc_r broken in 2.2 Message-ID: <199612171531.IAA08919@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199612170939.KAA15004@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <199612162346.QAA05267@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199612170939.KAA15004@uriah.heep.sax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > This also requires backing out the 1.6 revision of include/time.h as > > well. > > This change looked ``too much like a bug fix'' to me, that's why i've > pulled it, along with the function change itself. Oh, I agree it's a bugfix, but it's a non-trivial bug fix. Jeff would know all of the affected files. > Curious, why used libc_r to have differing return types for them? POSIX apparently changed the return types. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612171531.IAA08919>