Date: Mon, 11 Dec 1995 16:04:37 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@tribe.com> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Cc: grog@lemis.de, chuckr@glue.umd.edu, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who's working on ISDN? Message-ID: <199512120004.QAA07435@bubba.tribe.com> In-Reply-To: <5661.818536175@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Dec 9, 95 11:09:35 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The real story is that some Central Offices in the U.S. are able to > offer real 64K B channels and some can't, especially if the endpoints > span multiple COs. It doesn't appear to have anything to do with the > switch (I know people running real, measured, 64K speeds on both the > AT&T 5ESS and NT DMS-100 switches) and would appear to be more of a > factor involving trunk bandwidth between COs. > > A friend at Cisco just got bumped from 56K to 64K as a result of some > PacBell upgrade, and he's a considerable distance away from the Cisco > side, so evidently the problem is being dealt with (at least in the > S.F. Bay Area) PacBell claims they'll have 100% clear channel 64K in California real soon... -Archie _______________________________________________________________________________ Archie L. Cobbs, archie@tribe.com * Tribe Computer Works http://www.tribe.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199512120004.QAA07435>