Date: Thu, 2 Oct 1997 08:25:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, tlambert@primenet.com, Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com, bugs@freebsd.org, dg@root.com, hackers@freebsd.org, pst@juniper.net, richard@a42.deep-thought.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD TCP stack and RST processing [subj changed] Message-ID: <199710020825.BAA24472@usr08.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <97Oct1.191014pdt.177486@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Oct 1, 97 07:10:10 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >I think the "ignore H_ACK for the compare" suggestion is best. > > No. Validating the ACK is a required part of RST processing in SYN_SENT > state (but not in SYN_RECEIVED). The fallthrough case does this. We are talking about the conditions under which a fallthreough can occur. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710020825.BAA24472>