Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:34:27 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@bitfrost.no> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ulpt can't attach Lexmark E120 Message-ID: <5215F743.8060403@bitfrost.no> In-Reply-To: <5215F4DF.6000305@m5p.com> References: <5105527F.3010708@m5p.com> <201301271915.47712.hselasky@c2i.net> <510570C1.1060607@m5p.com> <201301272007.30682.hselasky@c2i.net> <5105AB16.2000607@m5p.com> <5215F4DF.6000305@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/22/13 13:24, George Mitchell wrote: > As I was saying a few minutes ago ... > > On 01/27/13 17:32, George Mitchell wrote: >> On 01/27/13 14:07, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: >>> [...] I need output when hw.usb.ulpt.debug=15 to say exactly. >>> Could you >>> ask the provider of the binaries to compile having USB_DEBUG set, also >>> for the >>> modules. >>> >>> --HPS >>> >> >> I'm working on getting a debug build ... Thanks for your help so far. >> I notice that there seem to be only trivial differences between the 9.1 >> release ulpt and the 10.0 current ulpt driver. -- George > > (This is on a Raspberry Pi.) It took me a bit longer than anticipated, > but here is the output, from an image built over last weekend: Hi, Could you run: usbdump -i usbusX -f Y -s 65536 To get a dump of the USB activity when you plug the device? The message in question is not important, and might be changed to not cancel the ulpt attach routine. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5215F743.8060403>