Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 21:51:37 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Bromirski?= <lbromirski@mr0vka.eu.org> To: Tony Sarendal <tony@polarcap.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter 4.1.6 won't build on FreeBSD5.3 amd64 (fwd) Message-ID: <422F61D8.8040603@mr0vka.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200503091539.18047.tony@polarcap.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.62.0503082118370.17320@mail.sbb.co.yu> <422E240B.7010502@mr0vka.eu.org> <200503091539.18047.tony@polarcap.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Sarendal wrote: > None of our 7200's will come anyway near those numbers. > Are you sure it's cisco you are using =) ;) I can't argue for any 7200 in any situation, but again let me repeat, that the numbers I gave are for pure, fast-switched/CEFed routing. I think this discussion should migrate to cisco-nsp or some other list, because it's freebsd-net, not Cisco-net. As for real life, I'm currently logged on on a 7206VXR/NPE-G1 that handles 2 full BGP feeds, does a lot of filtering (Turbo ACLs, uRPF), shaping, policing, and pushes about 200kpps (slightly above 100Mbit/s total, across two built-in GEs and some other interfaces). And it's loaded up to 60%. I unfortunately can't give You any classified or internal data, but as I said YMMV - at it actually varies ;) -- this space was intentionally left blank | Lukasz Bromirski you can insert your favourite quote here | lukasz:bromirski,net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?422F61D8.8040603>