Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 19:29:35 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fatal Trap Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901111928140.84303-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990111170851.greg@uswest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 11 Jan 1999, Greg Rowe wrote: > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid=1; lapic.id = 01000000(I've also seen it for cpuid0) > fault virtual address = 0x0 > fault code = supervisor write, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf0216357 > stack pointer = 0x10:0xff618ce8 > frame pointer = 0x10:0xff618d0c > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 243 (tar) > interrupt mask = net tty bio cam <-SMP:XXX why is this XXX? is it just an indication that using spl() is a bad thing for SMP and that movement away from the spl() model of interupt servicing is a good thing? -Alfred > kernel: type 12 trap, code 0 > Stopped at generic_bzero+0xf: repe stosl %es:(%edi) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9901111928140.84303-100000>