Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:38:58 -0400 From: Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com> To: "liquid" <liquid@homebass.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating to BIND 9 (WAS: RE: BIND fix for VeriSign's unregistered domain redirections?) Message-ID: <8CC45DAF-EB80-11D7-80F4-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com> In-Reply-To: <003a01c37f8b$1a291eb0$6400a8c0@windows>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, September 20, 2003, at 11:22 AM, liquid wrote: > Also, the existing named.conf I've written... will it work if I make it > really simplified(for now - I know that bind 9 adds new functionality > so > eventually I'd find myself tweaking that a little)? > > Thanks in advance for any insight. > Bind 9 is much more strict about config files. When i switched from 8 to 9, I had one subtle syntax error (well it was valid in 8) that caused me a great deal of grief. You might want to look at the DNS and Bind cookbook by O'Reilly and compare your dns entries. Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former." - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8CC45DAF-EB80-11D7-80F4-0030656DD690>