Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:52:59 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPSec fixes Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401171337060.66397@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <yged69kurwg.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401140934230.30149@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040115041435.7B739A6@coconut.itojun.org> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401152212230.66397@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <Pine.BSF.4.53.0401160829530.66397@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <yged69kurwg.wl%ume@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: Hi, > bzeeb-lists> I never applied it as going through the code showed that it will not > bzeeb-lists> do the right thing(TM). See older mail. > > You wrote that the check is entirely useless. However, the patch > actually changed the behavior and fixed the problem on my box. > Without the patch, I could reproduce a panic easily by setkey. > So, I wish to hear an actuall result on your box. short answer (before CHECKER will find it ;-) : It will work *argl* but is _not_ considered to be a correct solution so please do not apply. I still consider my original patch to be correct. I will post a detailed argumentation for discussion within the next hours after I have done some other work I have to do (away from computing machines ;-). -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0401171337060.66397>