Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:50:33 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com> To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" <freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Difference in event channel implementation for Xen PV vs HVM guests Message-ID: <514B0219.3040704@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <514B0073.4070406@citrix.com> References: <51470A2B.5040609@citrix.com> <9AE68E59-739C-499C-9991-0C84D4584981@freebsd.org> <514B0073.4070406@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21/03/13 13:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On 18/03/13 14:08, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > Hi Roger, >> >> I know of no reasons why XENHVM cannot use the full event channel >> interface. In fact, Spectra Logic implemented PV timers and a >> general cleanup of the HVM event channel interface. I haven't merged >> it back yet because I know the changes break PV and I haven't found >> time to clean up the PV code, merge the HVM and PV event channel >> systems, and move IPI/MSI delivery to event channels. >> >> I've uploaded Spectra's changes here: >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~gibbs/xen_ev/ > > Hi Justin, > > There's at least one file which seems to be missing: Ops, there at least two files missing: sys/x86/xen/hvm.c sys/xen/evtchn/evtchnvar.h
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?514B0219.3040704>