Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 05:53:43 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: is_sk locking in sk_attach Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407120551241.12756@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.53.0407102229190.12756@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <20040711152739.W76940@carver.gumbysoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004, Doug White wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > there had been some discussion lately about if_sk and attach locking. > > compiled if_sk as module on amd64 and kldloading started a race with > > follwoing output: > > If you have unpatched sk sources, the locking is entirely wrong. You > _will_ get witness warnings. I have a basic patch that gets rid of most with my attach patch not yet, but I had seen those with my old kernel including a LOR. > of them, and I think bms is working on a more complete lockdown. I posted > my patch to -current, but I can't guarantee its entirely correct :) I had thought it got comitted already. Will import it into my local tree then. Thanks. -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.53.0407120551241.12756>